A large scale study of blast effects from a structural reactive material solid under explosive loading
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A structural reactive material (SRM) is made by consolidating a mixture of micro- or nanometric reactive metals and metal compounds to the theoretical maximum density (TMD). A SRM can thus possess a higher energy density, relying on various exothermic reactions, and higher mechanical strength and heat resistance than that of conventional CHNO explosives. Small scale studies of a SRM solid have made progresses specifically to explore it as an energy source for air blast through reaction of fine SRM fragments under explosive loading. These subscale studies comprised a large number of experiments, whereby explosives were encased in a thick-walled SRM solid cylindrical shell with diameters ranging from 40 mm to 100 mm and explosive masses from 100 g to 1.2 kg, using different formulations to provide a variety of detonation pressures and resulting in a SRM casing-to-explosive mass ratio up to M/C = 1.8 [1]. These studies laid the foundation for the next stage of developments, including basic SRM solid explosion characterization, material properties of a SRM solid, and its dynamic fine fragmentation mechanisms and fragment reaction mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it