La salida del Reino Unido de la Unión Europea: aspectos políticos y económicos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom's exit from the European Union took place, a process known as Brexit,t as a result of a referendum in which 51% of the British people voted in favor of leaving the EU, moving to a status known as Cooperation and Trade Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom (CTA), which came into force on May 1, 2021, as a result of the above, instability was experienced in political matters with brief lapses of government in the chaos of the Prime Minister, so the objective of this text lies in the analysis of the conditions that gave way to Brexit and its implications in the political and economic sphere. Therefore, in methodological terms this article, a documentary review was conducted by approaching secondary sources. It is concluded, as expected, that the effects in economic and social matters were not long in coming, for the case the interannual variation of GDP in the third quarter of 2022, was 1.9%, likewise an increase in unemployment of 3.6%. On the other hand, it is necessary to consider that English politics, even when experiencing a notable volatility, as a result of this, actions have been taken to face the post-Brexit effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".