L'Aprenentatge de la lectura i l'escriptura des d'àrees no lingüístiques. Estudi comparatiu del treball en ciències socials a Catalunya i Ontario (Canadà)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Volem constatar com, en la nostra realitat quotidiana, sovint tenim poc en compte les necessitats de comprensió dels alumnes quan elaborem textos didàctics. Si no pensem en adequar el vocabulari ni la complexitat gramatical al que realment poden abastar en diferents edats, la significativitat dels aprenentatges se'n ressentirà. Si els estudiants no han estat capaços d'entendre el contingut, no podran respondre a activitats que els ho exigeixin, com les de PISA, que pretenen avaluar la comprensió a partir d'un concepte de lectura molt ampli i allunyat de la mera comprensió literal ii. Ans al contrari, només seran capaços de respondre a activitats d'un nivell d'exigència comprensiva molt baix, com les que els proposen bona part dels llibres de text d'ús corrent al nostre país, com ara vull constatar
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".