La música andina como pilar de perseverancia histórica identitaria suramericana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo, en su introducción y desarrollo, refleja las características culturales y sonoras en las que la música andina pervive como expresión psicosocial de identidad ancestral, a niveles no sólo geopolíticos y socioambientales, sino sobre todo en términos de géneros poéticos, rítmicos, de timbres y ritualidades, capaces de lograr una conjunción individual y colectiva entre sujetos y territorios que enseñan una perseverancia histórica identitaria suramericana. Desde una metodología de análisis comparativo y reflexivo, se ahonda la importancia de la música en mención como sostenedora de memoria, sobre la que se reconoce una trascendente sensibilidad del sur de América particularmente. Los resultados y las conclusiones revelarán que, a través del estudio de instrumentos y cantos musicales de etnias indígenas y mestizas se exalta la subsistencia de la música andina como un vínculo de unión y como una cosmología de los pueblos para el mantenimiento y no-olvido de sus valores culturales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".