La música andina como pilar de perseverancia histórica identitaria suramericana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article, dans son introduction et son développement, reflète les caractéristiques culturelles et sonores dans lesquelles la musique andine survit en tant qu'expression psychosociale de l'identité ancestrale, non seulement aux niveaux géopolitique et socio-environnemental, mais surtout en termes de genres poétiques, rythmiques, timbres et rituels, capables de réaliser une conjonction individuelle et collective entre les sujets et les territoires qui enseignent une identité historique sud-américaine la persévérance. À partir d'une méthodologie d'analyse comparative et réflexive, l'importance de la musique en question en tant que support de mémoire est approfondie, sur laquelle est reconnue une sensibilité transcendante de l'Amérique du Sud en particulier. Les résultats et les conclusions révéleront que, grâce à l'étude des instruments et des chants musicaux des groupes ethniques autochtones et métis, la subsistance de la musique andine est exaltée comme un lien d'union et comme une cosmologie des peuples pour le maintien et le non-oubli de leurs valeurs culturelles
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".