La historia del (no) retrato de Ausiàs March
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La tabla de san Sebastián de la Colegiata de Xàtiva ha sido, y es, considerada el retrato de Ausiàs March. Esta opinión está muy arraigada a pesar de que ya hay quién se ha encargado de desmentirla. En el presente artículo se presentan los argumentos históricos que evidencian una falsedad que se ha perpetuado al menos desde el segundo cuarto del siglo XX. Se exponen los fundamentos historiográficos, se analiza la iconografía de la tabla en relación con otras obras del artista y se revisa el concepto de retrato en la baja Edad Media. Saints Sebastian's table of Xàtiva's Colegiata has been, and is, considered Ausiàs March's portrait. This belief is very rooted despite it has already been refuted. The aim of this paper is to present more historical arguments in order to deny a falseness which is perpetuated since the second quarter of the 20th century at least. It exposes the historiographical basis, analyzes the iconograpfhy of the table in relation to others artist's artworks and looks over the concept of portrait in late Middle Ages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it