MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982980752

La riforma dell'abuso del diritto in ambito tributario

2018· dissertation· en· W6982980752 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupreme courtTax lawCommon lawSubject (documents)CriticismTaxpayerMultitudeGeneral planEconomic JusticeOrder (exchange)Administration of justice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis concerns the reform of the discipline of the abuse of right in the Italian tax law. \nThe work starts from the history of the subject and, especially, of the discipline development and the different opinions of the jurisprudence, both Italian and European, through the years. The research, then, focuses on the new art. 10-bis of the law n. 212/2000 ("Statuto dei Diritti del Contribuente), introduced by d.lgs. n. 158/2015, which contains a general anti-abuse of tax law clause and provides substantial and procedural rules in order to prevent this kind of behavior and to regulate the relationship between taxpayers and the tax administration in similar situations. \nThe goal of the reform was to solve the multitude of problems that afflicted the previous system of protection against tax-abusive conducts: especially the art. 37-bis of the D.P.R. n. 600/1973 and the general principle of anti-abuse shaped by the Supreme Court but not codified until the 2015 reform. Specifically, the European Court of Justice in the case Halifax and other of 2006 affirmed for harmonized taxes, like the VAT, the existence of a general anti-abuse clause "in accordance with the general principle of Community law preventing abuse of rights". In 2008 also the Italian Supreme Court, even if formally no law prohibited the abusive behavior of taxpayers, recognized the subsistence of a general anti-abuse principle based on art. 53 of the Constitution, which first clause decrees: "Every person shall contribute to public expenditure in accordance with his/her tax-payer capacity". \nNevertheless, the new art. 10-bis does not overcome criticism and doubts that characterize the previous anti-abuse system. In fact, despite of some improvement - like, for example, the prevision of a specific and obligatory form of consultation between tax administration and taxpayer - most of the problems that afflicted the previous regulation are still current, because of the strong link between new and old rules. The new art. 10-bis is, clearly inspired by the prevailing jurisprudence developed in the previous system, inheriting difficulties and criticism moved to it by the prevailing doctrine, which, therefore, considers the reform unsatisfying. \nThe last part of the work is dedicated to the relationship between the abuse of tax law and close conducts like tax evasion and tax planning. Indeed, even if tax evasion, abuse and elusion are all unlawful and, therefore, subject to sanction by the administration. The new art. 10-bis, par. 13, declares that abusive and elusive conducts are not a crime (anymore) despite of tax evasion, always punished by the Italian tax fraud criminal legislation. So, it is easy to see how important is nowadays to distinguish those cases, although in concrete It is often difficult due to the complexity that typifies both this events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari)Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207