Les rites au risque de la pandémie : le Covid-19 à la lumière des « ritual studies » Rituals and the risk of the pandemic: Covid-19 in the light of "ritual studies"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce colloque propose de faire avancer les connaissances dans le domaine des études des rites, considérés du point de vue des transformations et des bouleversements provoqués par la pandémie, pour mettre en valeur l’absolue nécessité sociale et anthropologique de la ritualisation. Le colloque se concentrera sur les trois aspects rituels mis en jeu dans le contexte de la pandémie : le bouleversement de la dimension sacrificielle des rites (avec la dérégulation des rapports entre le pur et l’impur), l’amplification à l’échelle globale d’une situation de « liminalité » forcée ou, au moins, inattendue, et, troisièmement, la concentration temporelle avec l’interrogation sur le sens de la ligne du temps comme ligne progressant sans arrêt en direction à l’avenir et au progrès. Les contributions attendues entendent interroger autant les relations, les cultes, les institutions et la manière dont le Covid-19, les a globalement « bousculés » que l’irruption du numérique dans la sphère rituelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".