Llauró-Urgell office of architecture. A quarter of century of “alarming freedom”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo explora la trayectoria de la asociación profesional concretada entre los arquitectos Juan Manuel Llauró y José Antonio Urgell, y profundiza en los principios disciplinares y propuestas arquitectónicas que definieron sus obras conjuntas. Desde un inicial cuestionamiento al rígido racionalismo del llamado Movimiento Moderno a mediados de la década de 1950, hasta una aceptación reflexiva de la tecnología en la década de 1970, el texto analiza, desde una perspectiva histórica, cómo el Estudio Llauró-Urgell se constituyó en uno de los principales referentes del ejercicio profesional de la arquitectura en la Argentina por esos años. En relación con los objetivos planteados, una especial atención a cuestiones asociadas con sus biografías personales permite identificar ciertas singularidades de su producción respecto de la de sus colegas, y vincularla con debates vigentes en la cultura arquitectónica del periodo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".