Lyttleton Street United Methodist Church, Camden
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first meeting house in Camden was a small, long, plain, unimpressive structure. It was constructed about 1798 on King Street, midway between Church and Campbell Streets. A few years later, the building was enlarged and painted. After the 1825 Quarterly Conference, a lot on West DeKalb Street was purchased and a new church was built. The simple edifice with plain adornments was completed in 1828. In 1830, a small parsonage was erected on the rear of the property. Two generous members of the DeKalb Street Church, Mrs. Sarah Ciples and Mrs. Amelia Haile, deeded about four acres of property at Hampton and Lyttleton Streets to the Methodist Church in 1851. They built and furnished a spacious 10-room Methodist parsonage. Early in 1875, a building committee was appointed. The site used for the simple rectangular brick structure was on the property endowed by Mrs. Ciples and Mrs. Haile. A year later, the basic structure was complete. It was dedicated in May 1879 and stands today. In 1896, the Lyttleton Street Church was enlarged by 20 feet and an organ was installed. In 1899, the exterior of the brick church was plastered. Sunday School rooms and a steeple were added in 1900. In intervening years, many improvements and renovations were made to the stately building. Source: NRHP; www.lsumc.net/templates/System/default.asp?id=38956
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.592 | 0.107 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".