MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983201607

Little Halophyte on the Prairie: Canadian Salt-Tolerant Plants as Remediation Tools for Salinized Soils in Western Canada

2023· dissertation· en· W6983201607 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHalophytePhytoremediationSoil salinityEnvironmental remediationHyperaccumulatorMesocosmSoil waterGreenhouse
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In western Canada’s prairies, secondary soil salinization is contributing to groundwater contamination, soil degradation, and plant toxicity. To remediate salt-contaminated sites, a non-invasive, resource-efficient method is required. Phytoremediation with salt-tolerant plants (halophytes) is a strong alternative to conventional site clean-up methods, as plants will continuously extract salts from soil whilst improving soil structure. Three native (Bouteloua gracilis, Bouteloua curtipendula, Distichlis spicata) and three naturalized (Puccinellia distans, Atriplex patula, Chenopodium album) halophytes were grown under controlled greenhouse conditions with salt concentrations of 1500 µg/g Cl- to quantify salt extraction from contaminated soil originating from a legacy site. Based on the results obtained, A. patula, C. album, P. distans, and B. gracilis were further studied under greenhouse conditions at extremely high salt concentrations (10,500 µg/g Cl-) and accumulated 333, 176, 6.49 and 2.43 mg Cl-/shoot DW respectively. Under ideal conditions, it would take the accumulator halophyte species A. patula and P. distans ~1.3 and ~2.4 years, respectively, to remediate the site. Proof-of-concept for phytoremediation studies is needed to validate the method, hence field studies were undertaken with seven halophyte species at the legacy site using raised bed ‘mesocosms’ spiked to 10,500 µg/g Cl-. Halophyte chloride accumulation and biomass production did not significantly differ between an unamended mesocosm and one amended with 30% (by volume) triple mix. Halophyte species accumulated 0.106 – 4.27 mg Cl-/shoot DW in the field, despite climatic extremes, with opportunistic species A. fatua, T. officinale, and C. arvense accumulating even higher quantities (1.44 – 88.8 mg Cl-/shoot DW). Since recretohalophytes demonstrated minimal excretion rates in the greenhouse and the field, all three Bouteloua species, D. spicata, and Sporobolus michauxianus were grown in salt-spiked soil and excreted crystals were imaged using scanning electron microscopy. D. spicata excreted smaller salt crystals at a higher density than the larger salt crystals of S. michauxianus, and on the basis of total surface area D. spicata excreted four times as many crystals. Overall, the results of the studies undertaken indicate that the use of native and/or naturalized accumulator halophytes are justifiable in terms of efficacy to remediate salt-affected legacy sites in western Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceFrench-language works237,207