Lykia-Pamphillia Bölgesi’ndeki Agoranomos’lar ve kentlerin iaşesi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bu çalışmada Likia-Pamphilia bölgesindeki görev yapan agoranomoslar ve kentlerin iaşesi incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın birinci bölümünde Küçükasya’da sitonia ve sitones’lere rastlanılan kentlerin bir listesi verilmiştir. Ayrıca bu bölümde konuyla ilgili yazıtlar da buluntu yerleri ve yer aldıkları yazıt derlemeleri ve ait oldukları zaman dilimleriyle birlikte verilmiştir. Çalışmanın ikinci bölümü sitonia ve sitones’lerin kent yönetim organizasyonu içindeki yeridir. Üçüncü bölüm ise Küçükasya ekonomisinde tahılın yeri başlığını taşımaktadır.\n SUMMARY\n\nIn this article I present agoranomos in Lycia-Pamphilia and nourishment of the Anatolian cities. In the first chapter I published a catalogue of the attestations sitonia and sitones in the Anatolian cities under the Principate. In this volume I gived which the inscriptions is written, and it’s finding places and it’s approximate date. In second volume I prensent place in the city organization of sitonia and sitones and in third volume I prensent place of grain in the Anatolian economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".