MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983432299

Measurement of the centrality dependence of the charged-particle pseudorapidity distribution in protonâlead collisions at âs<inf>NN</inf>= 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector

2016· article· en· W6983432299 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaH. Lundbeck A/SFondation Partager le SavoirEuropean Social FundCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueGeorgian National Science FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"Israel Science FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesAustrian Science FundOntario Innovation TrustNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaLeverhulme TrustEuropean CommissionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgence Nationale de la RechercheServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)CERNDanmarks GrundforskningsfondAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungNational Science FoundationLundbeckfondenCompute CanadaCanarie
KeywordsPseudorapidityGlauberMultiplicity (mathematics)CentralityCollisionAtlas (anatomy)AsymmetryHadronNucleon
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

© 2016, The Author(s). The centrality dependence of the mean charged-particle multiplicity as a function of pseudorapidity is measured in approximately 1 (Formula presented.) b (Formula presented.) of proton–lead collisions at a nucleon–nucleon centre-of-mass energy of (Formula presented.)  (Formula presented.) using the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Charged particles with absolute pseudorapidity less than 2.7 are reconstructed using the ATLAS pixel detector. The p + Pb collision centrality is characterised by the total transverse energy measured in the Pb-going direction of the forward calorimeter. The charged-particle pseudorapidity distributions are found to vary strongly with centrality, with an increasing asymmetry between the proton-going and Pb-going directions as the collisions become more central. Three different estimations of the number of nucleons participating in the p + Pb collision have been carried out using the Glauber model as well as two Glauber–Gribov inspired extensions to the Glauber model. Charged-particle multiplicities per participant pair are found to vary differently for these three models, highlighting the importance of including colour fluctuations in nucleon–nucleon collisions in the modelling of the initial state of p + Pb collisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207