MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6983466612

Mineralogical & petrophysical characterisation of gas shale, Colorado Group, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin

2012· other· en· W6983466612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrophysicsDolomiteSiltOil shaleLithologySedimentary rockCarbonateSortingGrain size
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Colorado Group mudstones within the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), have been characterised for their shale gas potential using a range of mineralogical, geochemical (LECO and Rock-Eval), and petrophysical (lithology, porosity, pore size distributions and microfabric) techniques in order to gain an understanding of the shales’ characteristics as suitable source rocks and reservoirs for shale gas. Semi-quantitative mineralogy of the shales was computed using a chemometric technique developed in this study, combining Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infra-red Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and multivariate Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis. The technique estimates quartz, total clay (illite-smectite, kaolinite, chlorite) and total carbonate (calcite, dolomite) to within 5% absolute of true value and demonstrates potential application for high sample throughput and thus high density sampling strategies for ultra-high resolution or multi-well studies. The mineralogy of the Colorado Group shales shows that clay minerals dominate the composition of each Formation, followed by quartz. Minor amounts of calcite, dolomite and feldspars are also present. Grain size data indicate that the Colorado Group lithology consists of substantial amount of clay-grade plus fine silt materials dominated by grains <10μm deposited as floccules. Pore size distributions are predominantly unimodal with an average mean pore radius (rmean) value of 50nm, although some samples exhibit bimodal pore size distributions reflecting mixture of mudstones and silt size materials. The pore size distributions of the Colorado Group Formations are generally influenced by the relative percentages of clay and silt, as well as by the level of compaction. Clay-rich sediments tend to be unimodal with tight pore size distributions while sediments with both clay-sized and silt materials tend to have broader and occasionally bimodal pore size distributions. The unimodal porosity nature of the Colorado Group formations, and the dominance of clay-sized and silt sediments may promotes the adhesion of gas molecules, which makes these sediments optimal for gas adsorption. Integration of the various data revealed that the Colorado Group depositional system is complex with widely changing seaway conditions showing no simple correlations between mineralogy, grain size and organic facies, or their spatial variation from palaeosource. The presence of sands and reworked shell fragments indicate a dominantly advective transport of sediments within the Colorado Group. Mud and clay cements are observed throughout the Upper Colorado Group, whereas calcareous cements are present only within the Second White Specks Formation, Medicine Hat Member and First White Specks Member. Laminations of calcareous coccoliths within the Second White Specks Formation typically display calcite overgrowths. Calcite overgrowths are also observed within mudstones in the basal part of the Medicine Hat Member. Such differences in appearance show the occurrence of temporal and lateral facies changes; the presence of facies changes is an important factor that can affect shale gas production patterns within a single, seemingly laterally-continuous lithological unit. High TOC (>2wt. %) and Type II kerogen appear to indicate that biogenic gas may be a dominant component of the total gas-in-place in the Colorado Group. The Middle Carlile member is likely the best shale gas target within the Upper Colorado Group. The Carlile Formation and Verger Member also appear to have the highest sorption capacity, based on a dominant clay sized fractions. However, mudstones within all formations and members display moderate to high clay minerals (fluid sensitivity), have poor fraccability and contain clay and mud cements. The presence of muddy siltstone within Middle Carlile member and its high potential for gas adsorption is likely to make the unit a viable target for possible horizontal drilling for gas shale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)→Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→