Minoration et santé: les formations discursives des communautés et institutions francophones à Toronto
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article focuses on discourse formations in the domain of health among Francophone communities and institutions in Toronto, which are embedded in a process of minorisation within the anglo-dominant society and, at the same time, characterized by processes of identity fragmentation linked to migration, to social and geographic mobility, as well as to identity politics. We are proposing a discourse analysis based on a case study which reveals tensions between two coexisting types of discourse: the modernizing discourse and the globalizing discourse. The modernizing discourse originates in the sixties. Based on the principle of equity, it justifies the existence of parallel and autonomous health institutions operating in French to desserve a Francophone community conceived as homogenous. The globalizing discourse, with its neo-liberal orientation, originates in the nineties. It challenges, on one hand, the symbolic function of such institutions and reduces them to their operational functions, and it attempts, on the other hand, to deal with a diversified population with complex linguistic repertoires as well as with multiple identities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it