" Modern konut " olarak XIX.Yüzyıl İzmir konutu : Biçimsel ve kavramsal ortaklıklar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Examination of the formal characteristics of an architectural product is not adequate when one is face-to-face with modernity. Especially products of alternative modernities require one to see through the concepts that are distinctive in the field of housing. These are commodification, standardization, mass production, pervasiveness, and reflectivity. Evaluation of existing building stock within the constructed framework in line with these concepts helps both to identify and to depict ‘alternative modernities’ and to acquire original innovation peculiar to a specific history and geography. This article focuses on the building typology that appeared in the last quarter of the nineteenth century in İzmir. While identifying the local factors and characteristics that shaped ‘the house’, it argues that the nineteenth Century İzmir house can be categorized as ‘modern’. Current academic literature includes the nineteenth century İzmir houses in the category of vernacular architecture peculiar to a region, such as Chios Houses or Rum Houses. A typical İzmir house has two floors, organized around two axis, of which one is narrow and the other is large. The upper floor is symmetrical, only having the oriel (cumba) as an additional feature. These row houses, consisting of three parts, the main part, the courtyard and the service part, were produced in the city as an alternative version on a theme depending on the certain physical and social factors. Increasing housing demand, the construction experience obtained from large scale public investigations, the stylistic interaction from suburban mansions, the use of mass produced and/or imported building materials, the existing construction methods, can all be considered among these factors, which are also related to priviledged location and status of İzmir in the Empire geography. Although it is possible to note that these houses resemble the terraced houses of the same period in England when the plan organization and building layout is considered, İzmir houses are applications of original solutions to specific problems and unique conditions of the period from 1875 and 1911, and deserve to be labeled as ‘modern’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".