MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983567339

Moral Identity: From Theory to Research

2025· article· en· W6983567339 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Power and Status Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoral disengagementSocial cognitive theory of moralitySalience (neuroscience)Moral psychologyMoral developmentIdentity (music)Experience sampling methodMoral reasoningMoral agency
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moral identity, often defined as the importance or centrality of moral values to a person’s sense of self, has long been understood to play an important role in moral functioning. However, critical gaps remain regarding its development, cross-context stability, and behavioural significance. This dissertation addresses these gaps in three empirical studies, providing new insights into the nature and function of moral identity across the lifespan and in daily life. The first study (Chapter 2) explores developmental trends in moral identity, testing predictions from moral identity goal theory (Krettenauer, 2022). Using a cross-sectional sample spanning adolescence to old age, the study finds that with age moral identity becomes increasingly informed by abstractly rather than concretely construed values, and increasingly underwritten by internal rather than external motivation. The second study (Chapter 3) examines the stability and malleability of moral identity using experience sampling methods (ESM). By tracking momentary fluctuations in moral identity salience in a sample of Canadian university students over the course of a week, the study demonstrates that moral identity varies significantly within individuals across contexts while also showing stable between-person differences. Further, it shows that within- and between-person differences are related to a variety of morally relevant events experienced in everyday life. The third study (Chapter 4) also employs ESM to explore how moral and immoral action undertaken in daily life can be independently predicted by both within-person fluctuations and between-person differences in the salience and motivation of moral identity. It finds that while variation at both of these levels in moral identity is predictive of discrete actions and behavioural dispositions, this relation is more consistently found and stronger at the within-person level. Moral identity motivations are also found to be uniquely predictive of behaviour, in context-dependent ways. Together, these studies provide a comprehensive view of moral identity as a dynamic construct that develops over the lifespan, exhibits trait-like stability while also responding to situational factors, and profoundly influences behavior. By bridging developmental, socio-cognitive, and individual difference perspectives, this research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of moral identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it