MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983570994

Modulation of TGF-B in platelets and neutrophils by dietary lipids

2007· other· en· W6983570994 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeanlingPlateletFish oilSunflower oilDietary fatCorn oilTallowBlood lipidsPlatelet activation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dietary lipids have been implicated in the pathology and prevention of variety of chronic illnesses including cancer and atherosclerosis. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-$\\beta)$ is a multifunctional cytokine that is believed to modulate the key steps in pathology of these chronic illnesses. Platelets and neutrophils are known to play a role in the development of these illnesses and are also known to transport high concentrations of TGF-$\\beta$ throughout the vascular system. Therefore the possibility that dietary lipids modulate the TGF-$\\beta$ content of these cells was investigated in a series of studies. A preliminary study was conducted with weanling Spragure-Dawley rats to assess TGF-$\\beta$ status of platelets as affected by dietary lipids utilising the CCL-64 bioassay. The growth inhibitory effect of platelet lysate, employing the CCL-64 bioassay, was quantified to reflect TGF-$\\beta$ content. Rats were put on four different high fat diets and one low fat diet for 6 weeks. Diets were composed of 18% test fat and 5% soy oil, by weight. Beef tallow (HFB), fish oil (HFF), corn oil (HFC), and olive oil (HFO) were used for the high fat diets and a low fat soy oil (LFS) diet was included with 5% soy oil. Supplementary studies were conducted with the neutrophils and plasma of the older rats. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicBiomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207