MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983704242

New insights on the distributions of freshwater turtles in southern Ontario using environmental DNA

2022· dissertation· en· W6983704242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal estate and construction management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental DNATurtle (robot)OverwinteringTaxonAbundance (ecology)Range (aeronautics)Relative species abundanceSpecies distributionBiodiversityIntroduced species
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantifying species geographical distributions and understanding factors that underlie them, has been a long-standing focus in ecology. However, obtaining unbiased, accurate species occurrence data can be challenging, especially when the organism has low abundance or is cryptic. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a fast, sensitive, and non-invasive survey tool to infer species presence. In aquatic ecosystems, eDNA has been widely applied to inform conservation of species at risk or for early detection of invasive species, but its potential for answering more fundamental ecological questions remains relatively unexplored. In my thesis, I used eDNA and community observations to explore the northern distributions and range limits of freshwater turtles, an understudied taxon in the current era of rapid climate change: 
\nI centered my thesis on three freshwater turtles in southern Ontario, Canada: midland painted turtle (Chrysemys picta marginata), northern map turtle (Graptemys geographica), and common musk turtle (Sternotherus odoratus). In chapter II, I focused on G. geographica and a single lake during winter, applying eDNA to detect communal overwintering sites below the ice. My work confirmed that eDNA can locate overwintering turtles and revealed a new site, which was further confirmed using a remotely controlled underwater vehicle. Chapter III focused on S. odoratus, where I used eDNA to sample waterbodies in southeastern Ontario within and beyond its known northern range. I modelled its distribution using Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) with parameters fully optimized. I integrated eDNA detections with community observations and gained new insights on environmental variables that shape and constrain the turtle’s distribution. In chapter IV, I modelled the northern distributions of all three turtles again using optimized MaxEnt. I addressed the issue of overfitting and improved the biological interpretability of MaxEnt models by implementing variable collinearity reduction protocols. Overall, my models suggested that distributions of the turtles are shaped by thermal conditions, characteristics of aquatic habitats, and topographical features.
\nCollectively, my work sheds new light on aspects of spatial ecology of three temperate freshwater turtles and contributes to an expanding toolbox of methods for surveying species, identifying critical habitat, and better understanding the factors that shape or limit species distributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it