MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983706473

A New Design for Sealing Headlamp Adjusting Screws

2008· dissertation· cs· W6983706473 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMemory, History, Trauma, Identity
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeadlampCADFixtureComputer Aided Design
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bakalářská práce zabývající se problematikou těsnění nastavovacího šroubu světlometu. Obsahuje analýzu uložení těsnícího O-kroužku a analýzu zajištění nastavovacího šroubu v pracovní pozici. Na základě analýzy je vypracován nový návrh rozměrového uložení těsnícího O-kroužku, a nový návrh zajištění nastavovacího šroubu. Vybrané části analýzy byly ověřeny výpočtovými simulacemi MKP v programu SimDesigner využívající 3D modely zpracované v CAD systému Catia v5. Součástí práce je studie proveditelnosti úpravy formy vstřikovacího nástroje nastavovacího šroubu dle navrženého řešení.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it