The new indians (identification with North-American indians and actualizations of indianity through the indianophile movement)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les indianophiles sont des personnes passionnées par les Indiens d'Amérique du Nord, au point de s'identifier dans une certaine mesure à eux. L'indianophilie est étudiée comme laboratoire de la construction culturelle. L'étude repose sur une enquête de terrain effectuée en France entre 1998 et 2002, avec des données complémentaires provenant d'un séjour au Québec (1999-2000). Elle comporte trois parties. Dans un premier temps sont étudiées les modalités de construction de l'univers indien par les indianophiles, selon un modèle générique de l'indianophilie en trois points : les connaissances au sujet des Amérindiens, les pratiques d'actualisation de l'univers indien, les représentations et régimes de l'indianité. La deuxième partie concerne les modalités d'implication personnelle dans l'univers indien et les différents modèles dynamiques de l'indianophilie. Enfin, le phénomène indianophile est replacé dans une double perspective, historique et anthropologique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".