NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FLUIDIZED BED DRYING OF PHARMACEUTICAL POWDERS USING A TWO-PHASE MODEL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tablet production in the pharmaceutical industry is a common process for oral ingestion products. Before tablet production, mixtures of active pharmaceutical ingredients and other excipients are granulated, generally through the process of wet granulation. The wet granulation process agglomerates mixtures of powder components to create homogeneous granules, typically using water as a liquid binder. Before the wet granules can be made into tablets, they have to be dried to an acceptable level. Fluidized beds have been extensively used for the drying of these granules. To better understand the fluidized bed process, mathematical models have been created to emulate the drying phenomena. Simplified models, such as phenomenological models, aim to capture the drying characteristics without defing the more complex kinetics and thermodynamics of the system. A recent approach based on a two-phase model is further verified in this work using experimental data from a lab scale fluidized bed. The model was examined against the pharmaceutical powder moisture content and temperature profiles from previous experimental work.\nThe model is comprised of the mass and energy balances of five distinct sections of the fluidized bed. Powder moisture and heat transfer are governed by a stagnant gas film in equilibrium with the surrounding gas. The model shows good correlation with the experimental data. It also displays the general characteristics of pharmaceutical powder drying, with distinct constant drying rate and falling drying rate periods.\nUpon model validation, optimization of the inlet gas parameters is explored. Optimization of the model is imple- mented, controlling the inlet gas parameters and incorporating a stepwise change during the drying process. It was found that a single stepwise change has a negligible effect on optimizing the process but is still useful around the end point of the batch. In addition, optimization results and behaviours are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it