MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6983798474

\nSearch for neutral Higgs bosons in multi-b-jet events in p\\bar p collisions at s=1.96 TeV

2008· article· en· W6983798474 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRadboud Repository (Radboud University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFundação para o Desenvolvimento da UNESPCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of EnergyVetenskapsrådetConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroWestern Canada Research GridKorea Science and Engineering FoundationDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGrantová Agentura České RepublikyDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Federal Agency for Science and InnovationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloFermilabNational Science FoundationScience Foundation IrelandSecretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires
KeywordsHiggs bosonPreprintBosonStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Event (particle physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

\n Contains fulltext :\n 72593.pdf (Author’s version preprint ) (Open Access)\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadboud Repository (Radboud University)Same topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207