Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND Established funding, exhibition and distribution models for feature films in Australia have long been unchallenged, with little variance. These conditions risk constraining certain aesthetic choices and possibilities for experimentation. Connolly, as producer, has been dedicated to challenging these stayed models to develop a new, radical cinematic language. He does this by bringing together artists outside of the film industry to produce works that develop a new cinematic approach. CONTRIBUTION SPEAR is a film project conceived by Connelly (producer) that brought director Stephen Page to transpose a live dance performance work onto the screen. Page tells the story of a young Indigenous man teetering between his ancient culture and the contemporary world, achieving a kind of 'hybrid cinema' that challenges conventional narrative film; it is a work that sits outside the Western paradigm of telling stories onscreen. This, in turn, demands an investigation of a new model of production and exhibition. SIGNIFICANCE As well as innovations in artistic screen practices, Connolly enabled opportunities for young voices from diverse creative practices to participate in the film industry. The significance of the project lies in its capacity to broaden the Australian film industry in new directions. Its success is evidenced by its inclusion at the Adelaide Film Festival (2015), Brisbane Asia Pacific Film Festival (2015) and Toronto International Film Festival (2015); winner Asia Pacific Screen Awards (2015). Funded by the ABC, Adelaide Film Festival, Screen Australia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".