MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6984702975

Page 72 Image 1

2013· article· en· W6984702975 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHoneymoonClimaxImage (mathematics)Training (meteorology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Of course no honeymoon is complete without a trip to Niagara Falls, so after leaving Buffalo bound for home we flew down over the great cataract. The old Brownie camera performed faithfully and recordedthe scene as we saw it 2000 feet up. The rapids above the Falls we plainly visible and although the Falls were dwarfed in size due to our perspective, they were wonderfully impressive from the air. The winding length of the Gorge from the Falls on toward Lake Ontario was easily defined. This was a fitting climax to our aerial honeymoon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)Same topicEarthquake and Disaster Impact StudiesFrench-language works237,207