Bibliographic record
Abstract
Children of homeowners are more likely to enter homeownership \nthan are children whose parents rent. We investigate whether this \nassociation is dependent on parental divorce, focusing on parental \nassistance as a conduit of intergenerational transmission. Event history \nanalyses of data for England and Wales from the British Household \nPanel Survey (BHPS) show that the intergenerational transmission of \nhomeownership is stronger for children of divorced parents compared \nwith children of married parents. Such an eff ect may arise from two \nchannels: (1) children of divorced parents are more in need of parental \nassistance due to socio-economic disadvantages associated with \nparental divorce; and (2) compared with married parents, divorced \nhomeowning parents (mothers) rely more on housing wealth, rather \nthan fi nancial wealth, for assisting children. Findings support both \nexplanations. Children of divorced parents are furthermore less likely \nto co-reside. We fi nd limited evidence that when they do, co-residence \nis less conductive to homeownership compared with children from \nmarried parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.023 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.307 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".