Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage constitue une réflexion sur la manière dont les Canadiens font face aux changements éthiques et politiques qui se produisent dans la société. Les citoyens sont aujourd'hui davantage conscients des différents problèmes qui se posent dans leurs environnements et ne limitent plus leurs décisions politiques à une simple participation électorale. La gouvernance dès lors doit changer de style et s'adapter à la nouvelle culture sociale et politique. Ces changements s'inscrivent dans un cadre nouveau, celui d'une transformation commerciale et financière importante, où les accords de libre-échange (ALE, ALENA, ZLEA) jouent un rôle décisif. En s'appuyant sur des études statistiques canadiennes et internationales, les auteurs mettent en évidence les différentes perceptions que se font les électeurs de la représentation parlementaire et leurs conceptions d'une gouvernance efficace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.509 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".