MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6984970563

A case of twelve

2009· dissertation· en· W6984970563 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlImmigrationEthnic groupAngerBeggingAnonymitySpace (punctuation)Ambivalence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Case of Twelve by Julia Gedeon-Matusky is a fictional coming-of-age story that explores the challenges facing a teenaged boy and his Slovak-Canadian family during the politically and socially tumultuous period in Quebec from 1964 to 1967. The family struggles financially and personally as it witnesses its Slovak immigrant community dissipate into the anonymity of the larger society. The members ofthe Danco family resist adapting to an increasingly French milieu within Montreal because they consider themselves part of English Canada rather than Quebec. They become pitted against the frustration, anger and occasionally violent actions of some Quebecois who feel their French language, culture and business opportunities continue to be thwarted by the predominantly English business elite. The novel also relates how various ethnic cultures intersect daily within an increasingly cosmopolitan Montreal as the city prepares to welcome the world at Expo '67. At the same time, it conveys some of the prejudices that were alive and well against women, divorced parents, people with disabilities, homosexuals, and the hippie culture then coming into vogue. Marek Danco filters all these experiences as a 13-to-15-year-old boy who is striving to attain his personal space and freedom as well as sexual experience, all while trying to figure who might have abused a little girl who he helps to rescue from a manhole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207