Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the Autumn 2006 issue of SHARP News. SHARP News (ISSN 1073-1725) is the quarterly newsletter of the Society for the History of Authorship, Reading and Publishing, Inc. Set in Adobe Garamond with Wingdings. Editor: Sydney Shep; Review Editors: Fritz Levy, Gail Shivel, Lisa Pon, Tina Ray Murray; Bibliographer: Robert N. Matuozzi. CONTENTS: SHARP HAGUE 2006; SHARP AWARDS 2006; SHARP MINNEAPOLIS 2007; A SHARP FIRST!; MACHIAVELLIAN CONGRATS; CONFERENCE REVIEWS; FORTHCOMING EVENTS; BOOK REVIEWS; IN SHORT; BOOK REVIEWS UPDATE; EXHIBITION REVIEWS; CALLS FOR PAPERS; RED UPDATE; JEBS RELAUNCH; BIBLIOGRAPHY; OLD BOOKS, NEW USES; THE EXPANDING BOOKSHELF. This issue includes the following contributions: A First-Timer's Perspective (SHARP HAGUE 2006), by Judith Jennings (p. 1); From Our President, by Bob Patten (pp. 1-2); To the Membership of SHARP, by Leslie Howsam, Mary Lu MacDonald, David Stam, Elizabeth Webby, Alexis Weedon (p. 2); Award for Distinguished Achievement [ADA] (SHARP AWARDS 2006), by Leslie Howsam with a message from John North (p. 3); DeLong Prize 2006 (SHARP AWARDS 2006) (pp. 3-4); SHARP Student Prize (SHARP AWARDS 2006), by Ezra Greenspan, Jonathan Rose (p. 4); Open the Book, Open the Mind, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 11-15 July 2007 (SHARP MINNEAPOLIS 2007) (p. 4); A SHARP FIRST!, by Alistair McCleery (p. 4); MACHIAVELLIAN CONGRATS, by Jonathan Rose (p. 4); Publishing Classics since 1800 (CONFERENCE REVIEWS), by Sandy Malcolm (pp. 5-6); "Book Roads" in East Asia (CONFERENCE REVIEWS), by Peter Kornicki (p. 7); Magazines and Modernity in Australasia, Australian Studies Centre, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia, 8-9 December 2006 (FORTHCOMING EVENTS) (p. 7); BOOK REVIEWS, by Elisabeth-Christine Muelsch, Ellis Tinios, W.A. Kelly, S.J. Connolly, Victoria Gardner, Robert N. Matuozzi, Kai-wing Chow, David Finkelstein, Joad Raymond, Gillian Wright (pp. 8-15); IN SHORT, by Gail Shivel (pp. 15-16); Origins of European Printmaking: Fifteenth-Century Woodcuts and Their Public, National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, 4 September-27 November 2005 (EXHIBITION REVIEWS), by Lisa Pon (pp. 16-17); Work of Many Hands: The Art of Islamic Bookmaking, Art Institute of Chicago, Parts I and II: 1 May-28 August 2006 (EXHIBITION REVIEWS), by Kay Shelton (p. 17); Sacred Leaves: The Book between Manuscript & Print, Tampa Library, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 22-23 February 2007 (CALLS FOR PAPERS) (p. 18); The Oral, the Written, and Other Verbal Media: Interfaces and Audiences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, 19-21 June 2008 (CALLS FOR PAPERS) (p. 18).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.598 | 0.583 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".