MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6985778578

Book reviews

2003· article· de· W6985778578 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · 2003
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Foundation (evidence)EinsteinPhysicist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

W Schröder ed.: The Einstein Century of Physics - The First Quarter (Collected papers by Hans-Jürgen Treder), Beitr. Gesch. Physik u. kosm. Physik, Science Ed., Bremen, Vol.\\ 5, 2001, 52 pp; W Schröder ed.: Solar Variability and Geomagnetism. Beitr. Gesch. Geophysik u. kosm. Physik, Science Edition, Bremen/Potsdam, Vol. 3, No. 2, (and IAGA IDCH Newsletter, No. 44) 2002, 300 pp; W. Schröder ed.: Alte und neue Probleme der Physik und Geophysik. Beitr. Gesch. Geophysik u. kosm. Physik, Science Edition, Bremen/Potsdam, Vol. 4, No.1, (and IAGA IDCH Newsletter, No. 46), 2003, 160 pp; W. Schröder ed.: Leuchtende Nachtwolken/Noctilucent clouds. Beitr. Gesch. Geophysik u. kosm. Physik, Arbeitskreis Gesch. Geoph. u. kosm. Physik, Science Edition, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2003, 182 pp; W. Schröder ed.: Das Polarlicht (Hermann Fritz und die Polarlichtforschung)/The Aurora Borealis (Hermann Fritz and the Foundation of Auroral Research). Beitr. Gesch. Geophysik u. kosm. Physik, Arbeitskreis Gesch. Geoph. u. kosm. Physik, Science Edition, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2004, 60 pp;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5020.504

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences)Same topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207