MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6985911222

Abortion on Trial

2002· article· en· W6985911222 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbortionGovernment (linguistics)NewspaperLicenseEconomic JusticeAdministration (probate law)Criminal justice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The confederate flag still flies high over the county government complex in the northern Florida city of Ocala, where Dr. James Scott Pendergraft was convicted in February, 2001 of federal charges of attempted extortion, conspiracy, and mail fraud.'In an almost unprecedented attack on an abortion provider through the criminal justice system, local officials in Ocala collaborated with federal prosecutors to shut down Pendergraft on the grounds that he conspired with a colleague to extort money from the city and county governments.'Pendergraft, an African-American late-term abortion provider who owns five Florida clinics, faced a maximum sentence of thirty years in jail and the loss of his medical license In the spring of 2001, the doctor was sentenced to almost four years in jail.4 C 2002, The Regents of the University of California Editors' Note: In the citations for the Commentary section, we tried to note the most accessible version of each source.If an article was available both in a newspaper archive that requires readers to pay for its articles, and available in full on a cost-free website, we provided the costfree website.t A version of this piece, co-authored by Hillary Frey, first appeared in The Nation Magazine on June 18, 2001.Kennedy and Frey are both journalists who heard about Dr. Pendergraft's case through their connections to the feminist community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1320.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207