Oeuvres Complètes de René Descartes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oeuvres Complètes de René Descartes is a complete new edition of the entire philosophical and scientific corpus of Descartes, created by the Connaught Descartes Project at the University of Toronto (headed by André Gombay). The collection includes: All of the finished works, including those published posthumously All drawings, diagrams and schemata All of the correspondence (including letters to him) All of the surviving drafts and fragments The recently discovered abstract of the dissertation of Descartes for his law degree at Poitiers Individual titles include: Meditationes de Prima Philosophia Objectiones Doctorum Aliquot Virorum in Præcedentes Meditationes Cum Responsionibus Authoris Admodum Reverendo Patri Dinet Méditations Touchant la Première Philosophie Objections Faites par des Personnes Très Doctes Contre les Précédentes Méditations avec les Réponses de l'Auteur Renati Des-cartes Principia Philosophiæ Serenissimæ Principi Elisabethæ Les Principes de la Philosophie de René Descartes Les Passions de l'Ame
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".