MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986215249

Opinión pública y participación política: estudio de caso de la mesa amplia nacional estudiantil, MANE, y la discusión sobre educación superior en Colombia durante el periodo 2011-2013

2020· dissertation· es· W6986215249 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Democracy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Period (music)LimitingQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este proyecto de investigación tiene como fin analizar los aportes de las acciones comunicativas en la construcción de Opinión Pública, propiciadas durante el proceso de Reforma a la Educación Superior en Colombia en el período 2011-2013 por el movimiento estudiantil colombiano, Mesa Amplia Nacional Estudiantil, MANE. Así mismo, explicar la MANE, desde la perspectiva de Público Ilustrado y Opinión Pública planteada por Jürgen Habermas; teniendo en cuenta que la participación, es un mecanismo con diversidad de dificultades a la hora de concurrir en escenarios políticos, especialmente en aquellos donde se desarrollan habilidades comunicativas y se adoptan soluciones de participación juvenil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it