The Pacific Alliance's Relationships with its Future Associate Members: A Multidimensional View from the Perspective of Trade, Investment and Economic Cooperation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Pacific Alliance emerged with the objective of serving as a platform for articulating the efforts of its members in matters involving trade, investment and cooperation with the Asia Pacific region. The Pacific Alliance's projection towards this region has currently become impending as it has entered negotiations with Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Singapore to become Associate members. Since these negotiations will involve the establishment of new generation economic agreements between the Pacific Alliance as a bloc and these countries, it important to study the relations with this group of countries from a multidimensional perspective, as well as to address some of the main opportunities and challenges that may arise within the framework of this process. The study concludes that there is great potential for the strengthening of commercial relations with the Associate members in the food (especially products of animal origin, dairy products, and food processing) textiles and apparel sectors, which are among the most protected. Foreign investment and economic cooperation must be channeled towards the productive sectors that have the greatest capacity to generate value chains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".