Panorama actual y tendencias recientes de refugiados y solicitantes de refugio en el siglo XXI: México en el entorno mundial
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From 2000 to 2017, refugees and asylum flows have fluctuated greatly, generating ripple effects in countries, regions, and entire continents. These effects are felt deeply in countries of origin, as well as countries of destination and transit. From 2000 to 2017, the period that this article will be examining, Canada and the United States were the largest recipients of asylum requests in North America. Mexico received a growing number of requests, although to a lesser extent than its neighbors to the North. The following analysis situates refugee and asylum rates on a regional and global scale and invites us to examine and compare how the official discourse conforms to the actual policies that have been adopted in Central and North America, as well as examines interventions and frameworks for action that could promote both solidarity and public order. Realidad: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades No. 156, 2020: 139-163
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it