MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986266295

Parque científico y tecnológico de innovación para el agro en la Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina

2019· dissertation· es· W6986266295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Context (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Livelihood
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La presente tesis titulada “Parque Científico y Tecnológico de 
\nInnovación para el Agro” en la Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina en el 
\ndistrito de La Molina, tienen como fin otorgar a los usuarios los espacios e 
\ninstalaciones adecuadas con el equipamiento óptimo para desarrollar las 
\nprimeras etapas de sus micro y pequeñas empresas relacionadas al rubro de 
\nBiotecnología para el sector agro. La propuesta involucra infraestructura 
\nespecializada como talleres, laboratorios, oficinas co-working, sala de 
\nreuniones y de usos múltiples y residencias, todas estas alineadas a los 
\nestándares establecidos por el Reglamento Nacional de Edificaciones.
\nPara el desarrollo de la propuesta, con el apoyo de representantes de 
\nla Universidad, se realizó la búsqueda del terreno propicio para la realización 
\ndel proyecto. Posteriormente, se visitó el lugar para realizar el análisis de 
\nterreno con la información de los perfiles de suelos, ubicación geográfica, 
\nzonificación, medidas perimétricas y características topográficas. Paralelo a 
\nello, y considerando los aspectos legales vigentes, se establecieron las 
\nposibilidades de financiamiento del proyecto

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicRegional Development and InnovationFrench-language works237,207