Panel C: Speech, Silence and Community | 25th Annual Constitutional Cases Conference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This panel will consider cases in which the Court split over the idea of “positive rights” in section 2b, considered the relationship between section 2b and section 15, confronted the requirement of open courts in a democracy and dealt with a case about a church community with implications for section 2a jurisprudence.\n4:52 Rabiat Akande and Faisal Bhabha, Osgoode Hall Law School "Insulating the Church: Ethiopian Orthodox Church of Canada v. Aga and the Suppression of Public Law in the Construction of Religious Communities"\n20:08 David Lepofsky, Visiting Professor Osgoode Hall Law School "Viewing Ward v Quebec Human Rights Commission Through a Disability Lens"\n36:43 Bruce Ryder, Osgoode Hall Law School "Political Expression, Electoral Fairness and the Charter"\n52:20 Amy Salyzyn and Sam Singer, University of Ottawa Law School "Limits on the Open Court Principle in the 21st Century"\nChair: Sonia N Lawrence, Osgoode Hall Law School\nThis event was recorded on Friday, April 1, 2022\nHosted by Osgoode Hall Law School\nSponsored by LexisNexis and Osgoode Professional Development
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.043 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.077 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".