MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986309033

Parkinson Hastalarında Alt ve Üst Ekstremite Becerilerinin Çift Görev ile Değişiminin İncelenmesi

2020· dissertation· en· W6986309033 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease and Spinal Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNottingham Health ProfileQuality of life (healthcare)Montreal Cognitive AssessmentActivities of daily livingCognitionUpper limbTask (project management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study planned with the aim of to compare dual task upper and lower extremity skills with single taskupper and lower extremity skills and to investigate the effect of the dual task on upper and lower extremity skills in Parkinson's disease patients with different stages of disease. 15 patients with Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) score 21 or above, between 62-68 ages, in stage 1-2 (mild stage) according to the Modified Hoehn &Yahr Scale and 15 patients with Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) score 21 or above, between 64-72 ages in stage 2,5-3 (moderate stage) according to the Modified Hoehn &Yahr Scale and 15 age matched healthy controls were included in the study. The demographic data of the patients were recorded and assessments were made while the patients were in the "on" period. Walking speed was assessed with 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), functional mobility skills was assessed with Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and manual dexterity was assessed with Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT). These assessments were made during single task and dual task. Quality of life was assessed with Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8) for Parkinson's disease patients and with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) for the healthy control group. In this study, it was determined that the dual task has a negative effect on upper and lower extremity skills and this negative effect was observed earlier and was heavier in upper extremities than lower extremities (p<0.05). It was also found that the quality of life of Parkinson's disease patients was affected from the early stages and was associated with dual tasks effect (10MWT; rho=0.492, p=0.006), TUG; rho=0.672, p<0.001, PPT; rho=-0.682, p<0.01). The effect of the dual task on the upper extremities that begins in the early stages of the disease, revealed the necessity of early initiation of the exercises intended to upper extremities in treatment programs and it was thought that this early initiation will increase the success of the treatment and also will increase the quality of life of the patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it