MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986334934

Pathogenesis of aquatic bird bornavirus 1 in waterfowl

2023· dissertation· en· W6986334934 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVirology and Viral Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsWaterfowlAnasGooseProventriculusAnatidaeVirusInoculationAnseriformes
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquatic bird bornavirus 1 (ABBV-1) is a neurotropic virus in the Mononegavirales order that causes persistent infection in the nervous system of wild waterfowl. This virus has a high prevalence in certain populations of wild Canada geese (Branta canadensis) and swans from North America. Experimentally, chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) have been shown to be permissive to ABBV-1 infection. Therefore, the objectives of this thesis were to evaluate whether Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus), a common domestic waterfowl species, and Canada geese (Branta canadensis), a possible reservoir, are susceptible to ABBV-1 infection and associated disease. \nTwo-day-old Pekin ducks (n, 121) were inoculated with ABBV-1 through the intracranial (IC; n, 32), intramuscular (IM; n, 30), or choanal (CH; n, 30) routes, and one-week-old, Canada geese (n, 65) were inoculated with ABBV-1 through the IM (n, 23) or cloacal (CL; n, 21) routes. Control birds (CO; 29 ducks and 21 geese) were sham inoculated. For the goose trial, 6 uninoculated birds were added to each group to test transmission. Birds were kept up to 21 (ducks) and 18 (geese) weeks postinfection. At specific time points, select birds from each group \nwere euthanized for necropsy and tissue sampling. Duck eggs were opportunistically collected, and embryos screened for ABBV-1 RNA. \nResults showed that ABBV-1 delivered parenterally yielded high infection rates (> 43.4 %), while mucosal inoculations were inefficient. Viral RNA was identified by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry in the brain, spinal cord, and viscera (proventriculus, kidney, gonads) of both species. While numerous ducks and geese developed mononuclear encephalomyelitis, only a minority of ducks (8.9 %) developed clinical signs. Shedding of viral RNA was frequent in ducks, but almost none in geese. Vertical or horizontal transmission was not detected. \nThese results indicate that Pekin ducks are highly permissive to ABBV-1 infection and partly susceptible to associated disease. While Canada geese became infected, shedding was limited and horizontal transmission did not occur, which is in contrast with a possible role as reservoir. Further studies are needed to better understand transmission pathways and disease development of ABBV-1 in waterfowl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicVirology and Viral DiseasesFrench-language works237,207