PENCEGAHAN MALADMINISTRASI PELAYANAN PUBLIK OLEH LEMBAGA OMBUDSMAN DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA TAHUN 2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maladministration prevention efforts undertaken by the Yogyakarta Special Region Ombudsman Institute as a form of action to prevent maladministration in the administration of government and irregularities in private business governance. The Yogyakarta Special Region Ombudsman Institution called LO DIY is a regional institution that has the authority to be independent to administer public government by regional governments, private business institutions and individuals. Prevention of maladministration by LO DIY in 2019 has an impact on the number of increasing graphs of people who consult and complain to LO DIY from the first quarter to the quarter percent. This shows that the socialization was carried out by LO DIY to the citizens who had a significant number of complaints. Then from the significance of the agreed public service maladminstration can improve governance based on good governance, which in the concept of good governance requires a relationship between the community, government and the private sector. \nThe type of research used is field research, namely research conducted by obtaining data directly at the Ombudsman Institute of DIY using a juridical-empirical approach and data obtained by means of results of field research conducted by observation and interviews with leaders of the Yogyakarta Special Region Ombudsman. \nThe results showed how the maladministration done by LO DIY had fulfilled good governance. The form of business considering that carried out LO DIY with an outline establishes cooperation with individuals, governments, government and private agencies, and socialization through mass media, and social media. The data collection activity increased the number of public complaint reports to LO DIY in 2019, in the first quarter covering 69 complaint reports, while the second quarter consisted of 45 complaint reports, and in the quarterly financial statements 47 complaint reports, totaling 209 complaint reports for the third quarter in 2019. The significance of the maladministration debate carried out by the LO DIY has approved governance based on good governance, because the socialization carried out by the LO DIY can increase public participation in improving the running of the government, and the LO DIY also helps local government implementers and business practices .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".