MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986425596

PENGARUH KELEKATAN ORANG TUA DAN KELEKATAN TEMAN SEBAYA TERHADAP QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA DEWASA AWAL

2024· dissertation· en· W6986425596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUMM Institutional Repository (University of Maine at Machias) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHistory of Computing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)AccidentalAccidental samplingSurvey researchAttachment theoryInsecure attachment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early adulthood is a transitional period characterized by many changes and instability. In early adult development, individuals are vulnerable to experiencing a quarter-century crisis or quarter life crisis. Parental attachment and peer attachment are one of the things that can help individuals get through early adulthood related to quarter life crisis. Previous research shows contradictory results related to parental attachment to quarter life crisis and research on peer attachment to quarter life crisis is still rare. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of parental attachment and peer attachment on quarter life crisis. This study uses a quantitative approach with a correlational research type. The scales used in this study are the quarter life crisis scale and the peer and parent attachment scale. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression. The subjects in this study amounted to 350 early adults, who were obtained using accidental sampling technique. The results of this study are parental attachment and peer attachment simultaneously and partially affect quarter life crisis. Parental attachment and peer attachment simultaneously have an effect of 33.7% on quarter life crisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUMM Institutional Repository (University of Maine at Machias)Same topicHistory of Computing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207