MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986438538

Physiological Characteristics and Strategies to Improve Salt Tolerance in Alfalfa

2021· other· en· W6986438538 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegumeSalinityForageGerminationCultivarSalt (chemistry)Soil salinity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are 6 million ha of cropland affected by soil salinity in Canada. Alfalfa is not only an important forage legume to the Canadian beef and forage industries, but also is the candidate legume for reclamation of saline areas. We investigated physiological and genetic variations of salt tolerant ‘Halo’ and salt intolerant ‘Vernal’ alfalfa cultivars in five gradients of salt stresses (Electrical conductivities of 0 dS m-1- 16 dS m-1) in a sand based hydroponic system. Elements and organic compounds in different tissues were studied at the Canadian Light Source. RNA-Seq analysis of leaf and root tissues of ‘Halo’ and ‘Vernal’ alfalfa were studied at three time points after salt treatment at 12 dS m-1. ‘Halo’ showed significantly greater germination percentage and seed vigor than ‘Vernal’ at higher salt level, but no difference was found at lower salt gradients. The leaf and stem tissue of ‘Halo’ had higher amide concentration than ‘Vernal’ at all salt gradients. This study identified 14 (leaf) and 9 (root) candidate genes consistently expressed in ‘Halo’ under salt stress, indicating potential genes for marker development. In addition, a number of new salt tolerant breeding lines were developed under this project. Future research includes testing of possible beneficial interactions between alfalfa populations and halophile bacteria that could help mitigate salt stress on the plant. Link to Video Presentation: https://youtu.be/QGpr13PKGgE

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)French-language works237,207