Planck 2015 results XXVI. The Second Planck Catalogue of Compact Sources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Planck Collaboration acknowledges the support of:\n\t\t\t\t ESA; CNES and CNRS/INSU-IN2P3-INP (France); ASI, CNR, and INAF\n\t\t\t\t (Italy); NASA and DoE (USA); STFC and UKSA (UK); CSIC, MINECO, JA,\n\t\t\t\t and, RES (Spain); Tekes, AoF, and CSC (Finland); DLR and MPG (Germany);\n\t\t\t\t CSA (Canada); DTU Space (Denmark); SER/SSO (Switzerland); RCN (Norway); SFI (Ireland); FCT/MCTES (Portugal); ERC and PRACE (EU). A description of the Planck Collaboration and a list of its members, indicating which\n\t\t\t\t technical or scientific activities they have been involved in, can be found at\n\t\t\t\t http://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/planck/planck-collaboration. We\n\t\t\t\t are grateful to the H-ATLAS Executive Committee and primarily to the PIs,\n\t\t\t\t S. Eales and L. Dunne, for permission to use the unpublished H-ATLAS catalogue for the validation of the present catalogue. This research has made use\n\t\t\t\t of the “Aladin sky atlas” (Bonnarel et al. 2000), developed at CDS, Strasbourg\n\t\t\t\t Observatory, France. Part of this work was performed using the Darwin Super computer of the University of Cambridge High Performance Computing Service\n\t\t\t\t (http://www.hpc.cam.ac.uk/), provided by Dell Inc. using Strategic Research Infrastructure Funding from the HEFCE and funding from the STFC. This\n\t\t\t\t research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which\n\t\t\t\t is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,\n\t\t\t\t under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".