MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986479670

Pretreatment and conditioning of municipal wastewater secondary sludge using freezing and a combination of ultrasound and freezing

2014· dissertation· en· W6986479670 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Canadian institutionsNorthern Ontario Academic Medicine Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFreezing pointUltrasonic sensorHomogenizerSewage sludgeSonication
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the cost of sludge management on the rise, the volume reduction of municipal wastewater sludge is becoming an increasingly important issue for wastewater treatment plants. Current research is focused on pretreatment methods intended to increase the efficiency of anaerobic digestion. Unfortunately, many of the pretreatment methods studied show little to no improvements in dewaterability of the secondary sludge. This research was carried out to investigate the potential of freezing and combined ultrasound-??freezing methods for simultaneous sludge pretreatment and conditioning. Three methods of freezing were employed; conventional freeze-??thaw (FT), combined ultrasonic-??freezing (UF) and progressive ultrasonic freezing (PUF). The solubilisation of sludge organic matter, evaluated by measuring soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD), showed significant improvements for all freezing methods compared to the controls. The maximum increase in sCOD was 6.5 times the control for conventional freezing at -??30?C and 5 freeze-??thaw cycles, 5.3 times the control for combined ultrasonic freezing at 20% amplitude and 12 minutes of sonication and 7.7 times the control for the liquid portion of the progressive ultrasonic freezing samples with a three second sonication pulse for the duration of the freezing. The dewaterability of the freezing methods was also evaluated by measuring sludge volume index (SVI) and capillary suction time (CST). The three freezing methods showed significant improvements in dewaterability with CST ratios ranging from 0.12 ? 0.21 for conventional freezing, 0.11-?? 0.21 for combined ultrasonic freezing and 0.15 ? 0.26 for the solid portion of the progressive ultrasonic freezing samples. The freezing methods were compared to three commonly studied pretreatment methods (thermal, microwave and ultrasound) and showed equivalent or better abilities to solubilise sludge organic matter and improve dewaterability. Further tests revealed that the three freezing treatments also resulted in significantly higher concentrations of proteins as well as increased biodegradability and gas production. The gas production ratio over the control was greatest for conventional freezing (1.52), followed by combined ultrasonic freezing (1.17) and progressive ultrasonic freezing (1.13). The results suggest that freezing could be a very effective pretreatment method as it would be able to simultaneously improve both anaerobic digestion efficiency as well as dewaterability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Same topicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionFrench-language works237,207