Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1999, the Canadian Roofing Contractors' Association (CRCA) initiated a study to compare the quality and performance properties of bulk asphalt from various suppliers/manufacturers across Canada. The study was prompted by concerns raised by contractor members about the quality of bulk asphalt and, in particular, fallback (softening point drop back) after heating the asphalt during built-up roofing (BUR)applications. The study consisted of a quantitative analysis of changes to the physical properties of asphalt samples, including equiviscous temperature (EVT), after heating and assessment of the quality of the information provided to roofing contractors by asphalt suppliers/manufacturers regarding their recommended EVTs. The issue of the quality of EVT information is discussed in Appendix A of this paper. The concept of EVT is widely accepted as a quality control instrument in the application of BURsystems. The study was designed to assess the effectiveness of the concept as currently applied in the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it