The posthumous popularity of C. Marius
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uglavnom se u literaturi smatra da je popularski pokret, bez obzira na poraz u Građanskom ratu, morao imati svoje pristalice u Rimu tokom sedamdesetih godina. No, jedno je bio popularski pokret, a drugo je bila uspomena na politiku Gaja Marija. Odsustvo svedočanstava da je javno sećanje na Marija uopšte bilo prisutno sve do Cezarovog ediliteta, kao i rđave ocene Marijevog karaktera u memoarskoj i istoriografskoj literaturi, vode zaključku da je uspomena na velikog vojskovođu, vođu populara i spasitelja otadžbine, zapravo bila oblikovana zahvaljujući Cezaru i Ciceronu, odnosno njihovim političkim i ličnim interesima iz šezdesetih i pedesetih godina. Post-Sulin režim nije nametao formalne zabrane, ali među popularima te generacije morao je ostati utisak da je Marije bio izdajica njihovog pokreta, kao i da je bio nepotrebno surov u Građanskom ratu. Takav pretežni utisak ostavio je traga na (Ciceronovo) besedništvo, ali i na rimsku istoriografiju i memoarsku književnost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".