POSSIBILITIES OF SUSCRIBING AN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT TREATY BETWEEN COLOMBIA AND CANADA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los diversos procesos de integración y globalización que se han dado en la última década han propiciado un cambio en las políticas de inversión extranjera al interior de los países en desarrollo, por la necesidad de vincular nuevos capitales al proceso económico y por las ventajas que conllevan los capitales procedentes de la inversión extranjera directa y de portafolio. Es por esto que Colombia, en la década de 1990, llevó a cabo reformas legislativas y constitucionales, además de celebrar acuerdos internacionales sobre la materia. De cara a esta realidad, el presente artículo pretende ser la primera aproximación sobre las disposiciones normativas canadienses y colombianas, con miras a establecer las pautas para una futura negociación de un acuerdo para la protección y promoción de las inversiones entre las partes, que dinamice la economía colombiana a través de la presencia comercial en Canadá y que a la vez facilite las condiciones de los inversionistas canadienses en Colombia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".