MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986557969

Profiling cargo of brain extracellular vesicles in individuals with depression

2024· dissertation· en· W6986557969 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaCanada First Research Excellence FundGovernment of CanadaFondation Brain CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsExtracellular vesiclesProfiling (computer programming)ExtracellularDepression (economics)Central nervous systemMicrovesiclesVesicle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability with significant mortality risk.Despite progress in our understanding of the etiology of MDD, the underlying molecular changes in the brain remain poorly understood.Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-bound particles that can reflect the molecular signatures of the tissue of origin.They are also a means of intercellular communication, which is disrupted in MDD.The gold-standard for EV isolation has been through ultracentrifugation, which is tedious and lacks reproducibility.We aimed to optimize a more streamlined and consistent EV isolation protocol from post-mortem brain tissue and to determine whether EV cargo, particularly microRNAs (miRNAs) and proteins, have an MDDspecific profile.EVs were isolated from post-mortem human brain tissue using size exclusion chromatography.Quality was assessed using western blots, transmission electron microscopy,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207