The powers of a peace officer to arrest a suspect without a warrant, detain and use force : its constitutionality and consequences on the rights of a suspect
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peace officers are empowered to arrest without a warrant, detain and use force on \nsuspects. Suspects are guaranteed protection and promotion of their constitutional \nrights and any act that violates their constitutional rights will be unlawful. As a result of \nthe unlawful actions of peace officers, suspects are subjected to poor conditions in \npolice station holding cells. Consequent to the unlawful actions of peace officers, \nsuspects are entitled to institute civil claims for damages. However, the \ndisproportionate calculation of damages necessitates a uniform and mathematically \ncorrect method to calculate damages. Moreover, peace officers’ lack of knowledge on \nthe legal aspects of an arrest without a warrant, detention, the use of force and the \nimportance of the constitutional rights of suspects is the reason for the rate of unlawful \nactions and violations of constitutional rights. South Africa is bound by international \nlaw and regional law instruments. However, due compliance with the provisions of the \nrelevant instruments which promote the human rights of suspects is questionable. \nFurthermore, the South African legal principles will be compared with foreign \njurisdictions such as Canada and the United Kingdom in order to determine whether \nSouth Africa can emulate their best practices in educating peace officers on the \nrelevant legal principles and protecting the constitutional rights of suspects. \nIt is proposed that amendments to the existing legislation should be made in order to \nprotect the constitutional rights of suspects and to limit the powers of peace officers \nso that the rate of unlawful actions are alleviated. In order to compensate for the \nviolation of the constitutional rights of suspects, a mathematically accurate and uniform \nmethod should be implemented by all South African courts so that awards are \nproportionate, fair and reasonable. South Africa should make efforts to be more \ncompliant with its obligations as provided for in international and regional instruments. \nFurthermore, South Africa should make efforts to emulate the practices and legal \nprinciples in Canada and the United Kingdom in order to enhance and develop the \nlegal principles and practices in South Africa so that the police force can become \nprofessionalised and the constitutional rights of suspects are promoted and protected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".