MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6986710163

Quarter Life Crisis pada Kaum Millenial

2021· other· en· W6986710163 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUMS Library Center of Academic Activities (Universitas Surakarta) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)FeelingThematic analysisAnxietyGeneration xBaby boomersFace (sociological concept)Qualitative researchFinancial crisis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Millennials are a term for a group of people who belong to generation Y, familiarly called generation me or echo boomers who were born in 1990 or early 2000, which were marked by an increase in the use of communication, media, and digital technology. Based on the age range, millennials are 20-30 years old, which is a transition period from adolescence to adulthood. The transition does not always run smoothly, sometimes it arises emotionally or in a crisis which is often referred to as a quarter life crisis. The purpose of this study is to find out the description of the Quarter Life Crisis that occurs in millennials and how millennials respond to the Quarter Life Crisis. The characteristics of the informants of this study were millennials in the age range of 21-25 years, both male and female. The research method used is qualitative with an interpretive phenomenological approach with semi-structured interview data collection methods and thematic analysis methods. The results of this study are the presence of anxiety in facing the future, the pressure that comes from the family environment, the fear of disappointing parents and lack of self-confidence that arises and likes to compare themselves with others, frequent problems related to financial needs, not ready to face the future future and responsibilities, feeling lacking in what has been achieved, feeling worried about the future life, unsure of a partner and other problems related to relationships with this type of friendship. Millennials' efforts in dealing with the Quarter Life Crisis themselves include trying to motivate themselves, making peace with the situation, looking for other things to solve problems to trying to overcome family problems. In his research, the factors that influence the emergence of the Quarter Life Crisis LC in millennials can be found, namely (1) the influence of social media (2) educational background, (3) current occupation, (4) family support, (5) environment , and (6) alignment between personal desires and environmental demands \nKeyword: Quarter Life Crisis, Millenial, QLC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUMS Library Center of Academic Activities (Universitas Surakarta)French-language works237,207