ReClaiming Montreal’s Memory: Demolition and the Photography of Edith Mather
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les démolitions représentent une part entière de l’évolution des villes sans que Montréal ne fasse exception à la règle. Dans les décennies qui ont suivi la Seconde Guerre mondiale, Montréal fait figure de ville moderne à travers le monde, avec la construction de nombreux bâtiments phares, un nouveau système de transport en commun et la tenue d’évènements d’envergure internationale. Ce programme de construction ambitieux a pu être réalisé à la suite de nombreuses destructions datant de la fin du XIXe et du début du XXe siècle. Aujourd’hui, le tissu urbain n’offre donc au mieux qu’une image fragmentée de l’histoire de la ville. En effaçant plusieurs bâtiments du paysage de la ville, la démolition ne se contente pas d’effacer plusieurs bâtiments du paysage urbain, elle menace le patrimoine des citoyens qui s’y identifient. Des traces de ces héritages perdus demeurent néanmoins préservées dans des archives publiques et privées, ainsi que dans les témoignages oraux des témoins de ces destructions.[...]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".